marycatelli: (Golden Hair)
[personal profile] marycatelli posting in [community profile] books
The Perks of Being an S-Class Heroine, Vol. 1 by Grrr and Irinbi

An isekai.

Read more... )

Indigenous Type

29 Aug 2025 18:56
dewline: "Aux armes pour les poches, tout le monde! (design)
[personal profile] dewline
I got wind of this via the League of Movable Type newsletter this morning, so it seems a good idea to share this with all of you reading this account. Because Indigenous type resources are part of the Comeback process as outlined by - among others - John Ralston Saul...

https://www.typotheque.com/blog/cherokee-osage-and-the-indigenous-north-american-type-collection
musesfool: Olivia Dunham, PI (there are blondes and blondes)
[personal profile] musesfool
All day on Wednesday, I thought it was Thursday, and all day yesterday, I thought it was today. But it was not! So I do have some Wednesday books posting to do, now on Friday!

What I've just finished
The Oleander Sword and The Lotus Empire by Tasha Suri, the second and third books in her Burning Kingdoms trilogy. Overall, I thought these two were much more engaging than the first book, and I wanted to know what happened next, but I wasn't blown away by them like I was by her Books of Ambha duology (which I highly recommend!).

Also I've read both Into the Riverlands and Mammoths at the Gate by Nghi Vo. I enjoy these novellas quite a bit and these two were wonderful. I especially liked the martial arts references in Riverlands and how Mammoths was about grief and stories, two of my favorite topics to read about!

What I'm reading now
The Brides of High Hill, the next Singing Hills Cycle novella by Nghi Vo. I've just started it but I'm enjoying it so far.

What I'm reading next
I am just happy to be reading at all so I cannot say! I thought the next Craft Wars book was out in September, but it looks like it's not until the end of October, so I guess we'll see!

Speaking of books, though, last night I watched the Netflix adaptation of The Thursday Murder Club and I enjoyed it - the casting is A++ for the most part (Helen Mirren is perfect as Elizabeth and Ben Kingsley is great as Ibrahim. And Pierce Brosnan remains ridiculously handsome.) - and I think 95% of the streamlining they did was fine, because there were a few two many twists and turns in the book, but spoiler for both book and movie ) I haven't read any of the other books in the series, though I'm sure I will eventually, but I hope it does well enough that they can make a few more movies with this set of actors.

Now I have to go take my strawberry summer cake out of the oven. I was invited to a cookout tomorrow at my sister's at the last moment, so I have to have a cake to bring!

*
jesse_the_k: Scrabble triple-value badge reading "triple nerd score" (word nerd)
[personal profile] jesse_the_k

@etymologynerd on TikTok[youtube.com profile] etymology_nerd on YouTube (note underscore)

My first fandom is language. Let me enthuse about the Etymology Nerd Adam Aleksic. He's a short-form video presenter, essayist, and recently-published author. He started on Reddit, but attained fame on TikTok, and his YouTube is 90% shorts (but not every TikTok has made it to YouTube). It's important that his videos are accurately captioned, cause he speaks faster than an auctioneer on meth. No video description and his hand-held camera means flashing and shaking images. The videos reward multiple views.

six links to short videos, accurately captioned without video description )

Three Essays to Read

If you prefer prose, his Substack newsletter offers RSS at https://etymology.substack.com/feed or luck into one of his maybe-monthly essays here via [syndicated profile] etymologynerd_feed (DW feeds only go back two weeks).

Want more? My first internet #lingcomm crush interviewed Aleksic on Lingthusiasm podcast 105—both audio and transcript there, with insights into best practices in vertical video and why it feels different than old-style horizontals.

Any linguistic communicators making you happy?

The feet knew

29 Aug 2025 10:52
susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
I've only been in a few orthopedic shoe stores but every one of them was WEIRD. This one was a little less weird except. There was a big yellow piece of paper taped to the front door that said YOU MUST SIGN IN. It was curling at the sides like it had been there forever. One step into the store there is another yellow sign repeating the demand and explaining it was because they were short staffed. I am so so so tired of hearing how everyone is so short staffed. Hire more people, people!!

Anyway, the kid who waited on me was about a 5 out of 10. But, he was a solid 5 and with attitude counseling, he could be an 8 or 9. But since they don't know how to hire people... I digress.

He shouted at me as I was doing the required sign in 'You don't have to sign in!' OK WTF?

It was a rocky start.

He listened, he measured, he recommended and his recommends were pretty spot on. I tried on about 4 pair and 3 of them were almost acceptable. I was hopeful. And then he brought out a pair of David Tate's (Evita) and put them on and before I even stood up I knew... Winner Winner chicken dinner.

I tried on more. Then I tried on a different size of the winner but, nope, perfect. Seriously my feet were just giddy. I told him I'd wear them out. He tried to put the shoes I'd worn in into the box and I said nope, I'd carry them. 'All sales final without the box! Also if you wear them outside.' You ain't gettin' these back, dude. Quit trying.

But he did have the last word... As I got out of the car at home and walked to the garage door, I kept hearing this noise. I looked down and that rascal had let me walk out with the tag still on!! So glad I didn't go shopping or a walking tour.

PXL_20250829_174257260

But, I have such happy feet.
[syndicated profile] etymologynerd_feed

Posted by Adam Aleksic

Last week, I published two op-eds that initially seem unrelated but actually aren’t.

The first, for the New York Times, was about how Donald Trump is influencing the English language. From phrases like “many such cases” and “many people are saying this” to “sad!” as an interjection, Trumpisms are seeping into our regular vocabulary—first through ironic usage, then through genuine application.

The other op-ed, for the Washington Post, was about how we’re all starting to talk more like ChatGPT. We’ve known for a while that LLMs overrepresent certain words like “delve”; now we have proof that people are saying “delve” more in spontaneous, spoken conversations.

Both of these examples point to something I’ve long felt lacking in academic linguistics: the importance of our “vibes,” or ambient evaluations of a situation. People aren’t saying “sad!” or “delve” out of a deliberate decision to adopt and replicate those words. Instead, we see them represented, subconsciously internalize them into our “mental lexicon”—our mind’s “dictionary” of possible utterances—and then draw on that lexicon to repeat the words in the future.

When our speech changes, that’s because of a changing “vibe” of how we can articulate ourselves in a given situation. But this is determined by the language we see as available to us, meaning that our vibes are influenced by the chokepoints of linguistic dissemination.

The reason we’re talking more like Trump and ChatGPT is because our language is being bottlenecked through algorithms and large language models, which do not represent words as they naturally appear: they instead give us flattened simulacra of language. Everything that passes through the algorithm has to generate engagement; everything that passes through LLMs is similarly compressed through biased training data and reinforcement learning. As we interact with these flat versions of language, we circularly begin to incorporate them into our evaluations of how we can speak normally.

The philosophers Deleuze and Guattari would note that these linguistic representations actually perform as mots d’ordre, or “order-words”: utterances that implicitly structure reality and create norms for us to replicate. In the same way that a teacher produces a “grammatically correct” version of English for their students to learn, these new technologies are producing their own version of English, which we’re also replicating.

This is inevitable. ChatGPT and recommendation algorithms are both based on neural networks, a form of artificial intelligence that learns from its inputs to produce new outputs. But those outputs are always going to depend on the inputs, which will always differ from reality, as a map from its territory. So any interaction we have with neural network-based media is going to change our vibes.

But what happens when those vibes impose power? We know that algorithms only present content that aligns with platform priorities, and that LLMs (looking at you, Grok) can clearly be manipulated to promote certain ideologies. Mots d’ordre definitionally impose order—and in this case, that order benefits Big Tech.

Deleuze and Guattari do identify a counterpart to the order-word: the mot de passe, or “pass-word.” In contrast to a performative production of cultural hegemony, the pass-word opens up a new territory altogether, allowing our speech and ideas to escape in a new direction.

I believe that internet memes are those mots de passe. If you look at the modern state of comedy, our jokes are in constant flux, reacting to current technology. References to “clankers” and absurd AI-generated images challenge the status quo of how generative intelligence should be used; “brainrot” reflexively responds to algorithmic oversaturation. These memes create resistance where you normally expect order—giving us a chance to reclaim our vibes.

The Etymology Nerd is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


please buy my book!

rydra_wong: Lee Miller photo showing two women wearing metal fire masks in England during WWII. (Default)
[personal profile] rydra_wong
That is a thing that is happening.

My standard joke here is that any game involving reflexes and coordination is going to be an excruciating experience of innumerable repeated failures for me, so I might as well play one where that's the point. This is only partly a joke.

Necessary context for anyone who has not met me IRL: I am dyspraxic as fuck. I was in my late twenties at least, possibly thirties, before I could catch an object being gently thrown to me across a short distance. My coordination, reflexes and ability to react to multiple inputs in real-time are so bad that I can't drive (or cycle on the road) because it would be OBVIOUSLY WILDLY DANGEROUS for me to even try (people would die). I have to buy special shatterproof crockery because otherwise my plate turnover is so high.

It was only with climbing that I learned that I can actually acquire motor skills, some of them, slowly, if I have unlimited time to practice them on my own terms.

Further necessary context: I'd been looking wistfully at the Soulsbornes for ages -- having seen videos such as Jonny Sims's Bloodborne streams -- as something that I'd probably love if I only had any coordination or ability at all to cope with having to react to multiple rapid inputs in real-time.

One of my climber friends has argued that Soulslike games are basically the same as working on a hard boulder project: you fail and fail and fail and fail and that's the process, each time you try to learn a bit more or try something new, and gradually you make progress, and eventually, hopefully, you don't fail.

And that's a process that I fucking love, and that works very well for my brain. Perverse stubbornness is my jam.

But when I look at something like Bloodborne -- the combat exchange is over before I can even track who's where and what's happened.

So I was thinking grumpily/wistfully and in secret about how what I really wanted was not an "easy mode," but a Soulsborne game that I could adjust the speed on (maybe set it all to 20-30% slower!), just so I could get my foot in the door, just so I could begin to maybe try.

And I watched more videos of other games, and somewhere along the way I watched people figuring out and/or being coached on how to get through the fight with the Asylum Demon at the end of the tutorial* in Dark Souls 1.

(I also read that Dark Souls 1 has the slowest and, in some people's eyes, "clunkiest" combat of the Souls games — not necessarily the easiest, but more tactical, less fast-twitch.)

And I thought, "... huh, I wonder, if I really worked at it, maybe I could beat the Asylum Demon? That would be kind of cool."

To be clear: I bought the game with the goal of seeing if I could beat the tutorial.

Cut for length )

what the????

29 Aug 2025 09:10
susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
I got dressed and brushed my teeth and reached for my pills and discovered I had not taken them on Wednesday OR Thursday!! I was sneezing all day yesterday and thinking the allergy pills had quit on me again. I sometimes forget a day every couple of months but never two!

If I die today, you'll know why.

Off to buy shoes in case I don't die today.

Wheeeee!!!

29 Aug 2025 16:45
oursin: Brush the wandering hedgehog dancing in his new coat (Brush the wandering hedgehog dancing)
[personal profile] oursin

Had the news today that I have been awarded a Non-Stipendiary Fellowship at [Esteemed Research Institution in My Discipline]! For next academic year at least. Yay me!!!

***

Dept of, gosh, some people have a very weird notion of Effix, wot: I can't link to this because it was all in screenshots on FB, but anyway -

Person posts in a romantasy forum that they reviewed book by A Well-Known Author asserting that it had been written by AI, on the grounds that it used a number of bog-standard cliche phrases that (we suspect) hurried and harried writers in a popular field in which you are expected to keep on churning out the product are wont to resort. (In fact I suspect that they crop up to a significant extent in your average romance novel and that many authors' fingers type them quite automatically.)

Well-Known Author intends to sue for libel.

Person who posted review, and claims to be an impoverished grad student (we ask ourselves in what possible field, seriously hoping not law, philosophy, or literature), is all wo wo wringing hands about this, and wonders if it is a plea in mitigation that they did not actually purchase work in question but obtained it 'by other means'.

I depose that if you are going to pirate a work and not pay the author, you are in no position to whinge that They Did Not Write It or indeed, complain at all. If you take a free book from a box that somebody has left on the wall outside their house for passersby to help themselves, you do not then go and knock on the door because somebody has scribbled on the pages and it is by no means a pristine copy.

Pod-Together Rolling Remix

29 Aug 2025 09:01
sanguinity: woodcut by M.C. Escher, "Snakes" (Default)
[personal profile] sanguinity
[community profile] pod_together has begun reveals, releasing a few more creations each day. [personal profile] phoenixfalls and I worked together again this year, and our creations went live today!

We decided to do a multi-fandom Rolling Remix, in which I would write a story and pass it to her, she'd write a story riffing off mine and pass it back, I'd write a story riffing off hers and pass it back... Nothing was barred: we could change fandoms and pairings as we liked. We ended with eight stories in six fandoms, whee! And then we each podfic'd what the other one wrote.

Readers/listeners interested in a single fandom may enjoy any story as a stand-alone. (That said, we suggest reading the three Vorkosigan Saga stories in order as a set.) More adventurous readers/listeners, however, may choose to explore the entire project -- and to that end, we've included "What You Need to Know" summaries about each fandom, in both text and audio.

Pod-Together Rolling Remix by [archiveofourown.org profile] PhoenixFalls and [archiveofourown.org profile] Sanguinity

Link to the series page. Includes all-in-one audio download, a map of how the stories are connected (and an image description for the map), plus links to each of the stories. Use the map to explore, or follow the series order, or pick and choose as you please. Please heed the warnings for the individual stories.


And here are the individual stories! Audio (both the what-you-need-to-know and the story) are included on each page.



...and that was a lot, so maybe I'll just make this an announcement post and leave the bit where I talk about the stories and process to another post.

Very big thanks to [personal profile] garonne and [personal profile] tgarnsl for their pronunciation help with the French and Gaelic! Any remaining pronunciation errors or oddities are very much our own.

What's the plan, Stan?

29 Aug 2025 07:36
susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
This will not be an entry about my new phone BUT the first couple of paragraphs will be. The good news is... I love it. It's got a lot of updated tweaks and tricks that I didn't expect and are hard to describe in a meaningful way. But outside of the fact that it is not cracked like my old one, it's even way better so I'm delighted.

BUT... yep, there is a but. Audible. This has happened before to me more than once. I do not remember what fixed it other than maybe Audible did an upgrade. Unless you have the audible app open, the book stops every 2 or 3 minutes. It resumes again when you go back to the app but seriously. I think Audible hates Pixels. Reddit does back me up with this ongoing issue. Every year there is at least one, maybe two threads about the problem. This morning I started this year's by linking to last year's and saying my new Pixel 10 had the same problem and I'd tried all the tweaks in the linked thread. I got a fast response asking what OS and what version of Audible. Now... new Pixel 10 - what the fuck os and version do you think I might have?????

I am considering a divorce from Audible. My annual membership renews in September. I have no more credits to spend. Maybe this is a good time to call 20 years a good run. Libby gives me lots of books. I changed my membership to monthly for the time being. If they fix the problem, I'll likely re-up. If not, then, nope.

But, speaking of customer experience... Bonny went to Fred Meyer on Wednesday. She wanted to find some step in sneakers. And she found the perfect pair of Skechers but they did not have her size. She found a Fred Meyer person and asked if there were more in the back or a different store. She said English wasn't his first language but she finally understood that they did not have more and would not because it was an older style. She took a photo of it and mentioned to him she'd see if she could find it on Amazon. He asked for her phone, she unlocked it and when to the Amazon app. He found the shoes on Amazon in her size and asked 'buy?' and she said YES! And he did. And yesterday afternoon she discovered they had been delivered to her apartment and they were perfect. She was so delighted. And so in love with that Fred Meyer guy. And Amazon. I think she's only ordered from Amazon about twice in her life. It was pretty hilarious.

Today I think I'm going over to that shoe store the podiatrist recommended. I looked online. They don't have many non-ugly shoes but they do have a few pair. So I'll go give them a shot.

And maybe do laundry. Baseball isn't until 4. Both my teams play at the same time for the next few days.

Oh one more camera thing. It has the most amazing zoom I've ever seen.

I just took these two photos sitting right here at my table. See the table I circled in red?

PXL_20250829_150558211.jpg

I zoomed in on it.

PXL_20250829_150609707.jpg

Isn't that wild???

Just next to that table, last night, some folks were set up for a little outdoor dining. With my new zoom, I could tell what they were eating!!! That has to be a football field away from here. Amazing.
[syndicated profile] theatlantic_health_feed

Posted by Craig Spencer

The White House’s AI Action Plan, released in July, mentions “health care” only three times. But it is one of the most consequential health policies of the second Trump administration. Its sweeping ambitions for AI—rolling back safeguards, fast-tracking “private-sector-led innovation,” and banning “ideological dogmas such as DEI”—will have long-term consequences for how medicine is practiced, how public health is governed, and who gets left behind.

Already, the Trump administration has purged data from government websites, slashed funding for research on marginalized communities, and pressured government researchers to restrict or retract work that contradicts political ideology. These actions aren’t just symbolic—they shape what gets measured, who gets studied, and which findings get published. Now, those same constraints are moving into the development of AI itself. Under the administration’s policies, developers have a clear incentive to make design choices or pick data sets that won’t provoke political scrutiny.

These signals are shaping the AI systems that will guide medical decision making for decades to come. The accumulation of technical choices that follows—encoded in algorithms, embedded in protocols, and scaled across millions of patients—will cement the particular biases of this moment in time into medicine’s future. And history has shown that once bias is encoded into clinical tools, even obvious harms can take decades to undo—if they’re undone at all.

AI tools were permeating every corner of medicine before the action plan was released: assisting radiologists, processing insurance claims, even communicating on behalf of overworked providers. They’re also being used to fast-track the discovery of new cancer therapies and antibiotics, while advancing precision medicine that helps providers tailor treatments to individual patients. Two-thirds of physicians used AI in 2024—a 78 percent jump from the year prior. Soon, not using AI to help determine diagnoses or treatments could be seen as malpractice.

At the same time, AI’s promise for medicine is limited by the technology’s shortcomings. One health-care AI model confidently hallucinated a nonexistent body part. Another may make doctors’ procedural skills worse. Providers are demanding stronger regulatory oversight of AI tools, and some patients are hesitant to have AI analyze their data.

The stated goal of the Trump administration’s AI Action Plan is to preserve American supremacy in the global AI arms race. But the plan also prompts developers of leading-edge AI models to make products free from “ideological bias” and “designed to pursue objective truth rather than social engineering agendas.” This guidance is murky enough that developers must interpret vague ideological cues, then quietly calibrate what their models can say, show, or even learn to avoid crossing a line that’s never clearly drawn.

Some medical tools incorporate large language models such as ChatGPT. But many AI tools are bespoke and proprietary and rely on narrower sets of medical data. Given how this administration has aimed to restrict data collection at the Department of Health and Human Services and ensure that those data conform to its ideas about gender and race, any health tools developed under Donald Trump’s AI action plan may face pressure to rely on training data that reflects similar principles. (In response to a request for comment, a White House official said in an email that the AI plan and the president’s executive order on scientific integrity together ensure that “scientists in the government use only objective, verifiable data and criteria in scientific decision making and when building and contracting for AI,” and that future clinical tools are “not limited by the political or ideological bias of the day.”)

Models don’t invent the world they govern; they depend on and reflect the data we feed them. That’s what every research scientist learns early on: garbage in, garbage out. And if governments narrow what counts as legitimate health data and research as AI models are built into medical practice, the blind spots won’t just persist; they’ll compound and calcify into the standards of care.

In the United States, gaps in data have already limited the perspective of AI tools. During the first years of COVID, data on race and ethnicity were frequently missing from death and vaccination reports. A review of data sets fed to AI models used during the pandemic found similarly poor representation. Cleaning up these gaps is difficult and expensive—but it’s the best way to ensure the algorithms don’t indelibly incorporate existing inequities into clinical code. After years of advocacy and investment, the U.S. had finally begun to close long-standing gaps in how we track health and who gets counted.

But over the past several months, that type of fragile progress has been deliberately rolled back. At times, CDC web pages have been rewritten to reflect ideology, not epidemiology. The National Institutes of Health halted funding for projects it labeled as “DEI”—despite never defining what that actually includes. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made noise about letting NIH scientists publish only in government-run journals, and demanded the retraction of a rigorous study, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, that found no link between aluminum and autism. (Kennedy has promoted the opposite idea: that such vaccine ingredients are a cause of autism.) And a recent executive order gives political appointees control over research grants, including the power to cancel those that don’t “advance the President’s policy priorities.” Selective erasure of data is becoming the foundation for future health decisions.

American medicine has seen the consequences of building on such a shaky foundation before. Day-to-day practice has long relied on clinical tools that confuse race with biology. Lung-function testing used race corrections derived from slavery-era plantation medicine, leading to widespread underdiagnosis of serious lung disease in Black patients. In 2023, the American Thoracic Society urged the use of a race-neutral approach, yet adoption is uneven, with many labs and devices still defaulting to race-based settings. A kidney-function test used race coefficients that delayed specialty referrals and transplant eligibility. An obstetric calculator factored in race and ethnicity in ways that increased unnecessary Cesarean sections among Black and Hispanic women.

Once race-based adjustments are baked into software defaults, clinical guidelines, and training, they persist—quietly and predictably—for years. Even now, dozens of flawed decision-making tools that rely on outdated assumptions remain in daily use. Medical devices tell a similar story. Pulse oximeters can miss dangerously low oxygen levels in darker-skinned patients. During the COVID pandemic, those readings fed into hospital-triage algorithms—leading to disparities in treatment and trust. Once flawed metrics get embedded into “objective” tools, bias becomes practice, then policy.

When people in power define which data matter and the outputs are unchallenged, the outcomes can be disastrous. In the early 20th century, the founders of modern statistics—Francis Galton, Ronald Fisher, and Karl Pearson—were also architects of the eugenics movement. Galton, who coined the term eugenics, pioneered correlation and regression and used these tools to argue that traits like intelligence and morality were heritable and should be managed through selective breeding. Fisher, often hailed as the “father of modern statistics,” was an active leader in the U.K.’s Eugenics Society and backed its policy of “voluntary” sterilization of those deemed “feeble-minded.” Pearson, creator of the p-value and chi-squared tests, founded the Annals of Eugenics journal and deployed statistical analysis to argue that Jewish immigrants would become a “parasitic race.”

For each of these men—and the broader medical and public-health community that supported the eugenics movement—the veneer of data objectivity helped transform prejudice into policy. In the 1927 case Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court codified their ideas when it upheld compulsory sterilization in the name of public health. That decision has never been formally overturned.

Many AI proponents argue concerns of bias are overblown. They’ll note that bias has been fretted over for years, and to some extent, they’re right: Bias was always present in AI models, but its effects were more limited—in part because the systems themselves were narrowly deployed. Until recently, the number of AI tools used in medicine was small, and most operated at the margins of health care, not at its core. What’s different now is the speed and the scale of AI’s expansion into this field, at the same time the Trump administration is dismantling guardrails for regulating AI and shaping these models’ future.

Human providers are biased, too, of course. Researchers have found that women’s medical concerns are dismissed more often than men’s, and some white medical students falsely believe Black patients have thicker skin or feel less pain. Human bias and AI bias alike can be addressed through training, transparency, and accountability, but the path for the latter requires accounting for both human fallibility and that of the technology itself. Technical fixes exist—reweighing data, retraining models, and bias audits—but they’re often narrow and opaque. Many advanced AI models—especially large language models—are functionally black boxes: Using them means feeding information in and waiting for outputs. When biases are produced in the computational process, the people who depend on that process are left unaware of when or how they were introduced. That opacity fuels a bias feedback loop: AI amplifies what we put in, then shapes what we take away, leaving humans more biased for having trusted it.

A “move fast and break things” rollout of AI in health care, especially when based on already biased data sets, will encode similar assumptions into models that are enigmatic and self-reinforcing. By the time anyone recognizes the flaws, they won’t just be baked into a formula; they’ll be indelibly built into the infrastructure of care.

Launceston

29 Aug 2025 14:58
cmcmck: (Default)
[personal profile] cmcmck
Pronounced lawn-son.

An attractive small town in north Cornwall.

We entered town by one of the medieval town gates:

See more )See more: )

Choir is Coming Soon!

29 Aug 2025 09:49
oracne: turtle (Default)
[personal profile] oracne
Choir is kicking off with a long weekend rehearsal September 6. I might or might not have to miss the first Monday night rehearsal after my surgery, which would be a bummer, but it's better than missing a concert.

We will be singing a joyous concert all about death, LOL, consisting of the following three pieces: Pearsall's "Lay a Garland," Victoria's "Requiem Officium Defunctorum," and Howells' "Requiem," old sandwiched in the much newer.





A return!

29 Aug 2025 08:15
sporky_rat: Alfred Bester:B5 looking very amused, text:'*sporfle*" (b5)
[personal profile] sporky_rat posting in [community profile] pokestop

Anyone still around in this land of "wow that is so much backed up research, good gravy"?

[syndicated profile] theatlantic_health_feed

Posted by Rachel Sugar

This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here.

Every year, there is a single day when summer turns to fall. In 2025, on the Gregorian calendar, this day is September 22. On the pumpkin-spice calendar, it was Tuesday, when Starbucks reintroduced its legendary latte. (For Dunkin’ loyalists, fall began on August 20.)

Pumpkin spice, as fans and haters alike will tell you, is not simply a flavor. It is a state of mind. You might imagine that, by now, our national appetite would be sated. You would be incorrect. This year, among other innovations, we will be graced with pumpkin-spice-dipped waffle cones, pumpkin-spice protein shakes, and pumpkin-spice spreadable cheese. That there are still products left to pumpkin spice-ify is a testament to human ingenuity. You can already find pumpkin-spice yogurt, pumpkin-spice almonds, pumpkin-spice graham-cracker Goldfish, and pumpkin-spice fig bars. There is pumpkin-spice bacon and pumpkin-spice cottage cheese. For the seed oil–conscious, there is pumpkin-spice avocado oil.

But just as the Pumpkin-Spice Industrial Complex whirs into action, as it does every August, there is a new threat. On Wednesday, the Trump administration imposed 50 percent tariffs on imports from India. This might be just another episode in Donald Trump’s ongoing trade war, except that India is a major exporter of spices: among them, cinnamon, nutmeg, and cloves. Together, along with allspice and ginger, these form the backbone of the pumpkin-spice mix. Like so many other goods, pumpkin spice—the taste, smell, and spirit of fall—might get more expensive. Just how much do Americans love it? We’re about to find out.

The timing is spectacularly inopportune. Long after Starbucks unleashed the pumpkin-spice latte upon America in 2003, it was easy to dismiss pumpkin spice as a trend. The nature of the world is that people get tired of things and move on. There was a period when everyone lost their mind over the concept of roasted brussels sprouts, but then they discovered cauliflower.

Instead, pumpkin spice only continued to rise. It became a personality. Pumpkin spice was a 20-something white girl in Ugg boots who kept a Pinterest board to catalog ideas about her future wedding, distilled into a single flavor. It became so popular that its very popularity inspired a backlash. Disliking pumpkin spice, if you did it very loudly, became a shorthand to indicate you had discerning taste. Anthony Bourdain hated it. John Oliver railed against it. Facebook communities sprang up to spread the gospel of revulsion. It was offensive precisely because it was so aggressively benign.

[Read: How Starbucks perfected autumn]

But pumpkin spice just keeps winning. Many people who might have once looked down on pumpkin spice, or slurped in secret, now “just embrace it,” Diana Kelter, the director of consumer trends at Mintel, North America, told me. Pumpkin spice has become so omnipresent that it no longer says all that much about you. Oh, you’re the kind of person who likes air? You’re one of those water drinkers? “It’s, like, beyond big,” Leigh O’Donnell, a consumer-insights analyst at Kantar, a market-research firm, told me. Over Zoom, she showed me a graph of consumer transactions involving pumpkin-flavored and pumpkin-spice-flavored things. The figures aren’t skyrocketing, but each year shows results higher than the one before. “Freight train,” she said, gesturing at the chart. “Ain’t no slowing down.”

The scope and scale of pumpkin spice—pumpkin-spice air freshener! pumpkin-spice dog treats!—only mean the tariffs could hurt more. Don’t expect major changes immediately. At Starbucks, a PSL costs the same as last year, a spokesperson told me: $5.75 to $7.25 for a grande, depending on the location. (Dunkin’ did not respond to my request for comment.) For now, there will still be plenty of pumpkin spice: pumpkin-spice crackers, pumpkin-spice bone broth, pumpkin-spice oat milk. (While Trader Joe’s will not be offering any pumpkin-spice hummus, that is only because it was discontinued in 2023.) This autumn’s pumpkin-spice products were almost certainly made with cinnamon, nutmeg, and cloves that were imported before this week’s tariffs. (There are also the seemingly unlimited possibilities of artificial flavoring.)

Eventually, though, America’s pumpkin-spice fix will become more expensive. It might happen sooner rather than later. Sana Javeri Kadri, the founder and CEO of Diaspora Co., a spice company that imports exclusively from India and Sri Lanka, anticipates that she’ll have no choice but to raise prices: A tin of Diaspora Co. pumpkin spice that now goes for $13 might soon be $14.50. “Everybody’s in the same boat right now, in that we’re fucked,” she told me. Even companies that likely have back stock and source spices from lots of countries—Indonesia, China, Vietnam, Mexico—are bracing: On an earnings call this summer, the spice goliath McCormick, which sources globally, predicted that tariffs could cost the company $90 million a year.

Imported spices, of course, won’t be the only reason the cost of a cozy autumn could go up. Your PSL might be served in a paper cup that is now more expensive because of tariffs, and the coffee is certainly imported; the foil top of your pumpkin-spice-yogurt container might have been made from aluminum that was imported and taxed. Americans are already beginning to feel the weight of the tariffs, and prices are poised to rise on all kinds of products. It’s another way that pumpkin spice is not special. Economically, as culturally, it is like everything else.

If a trade war doesn’t blunt America’s appetite for pumpkin spice, it’s hard to see what will. You could read its sheer dominance as a symptom of cultural collapse—evidence that everyone is simple now; that criticism, like punk, is dead. But unlike the current churn of trends that seemingly arise whole-cloth from nowhere—Dubai chocolate? Labubus? Lafufus?—pumpkin spice is staunchly rooted in reality. The pumpkin-spice latte was a corporate invention, but the first recipe for spiced “pompkin pie” was published in 1796. The appeal is obvious: It’s cozy; it’s nostalgic; it helps blunt the taste of coffee. Most things in the world are volatile, but not pumpkin spice. It appears each year like clockwork, reassuring us that, despite the actual weather, fall has arrived.

podcast friday

29 Aug 2025 07:22
sabotabby: (doom doom doom)
[personal profile] sabotabby
I am once again behind on everything (not just podcasts) so have the latest Maintenance Phase, "Seed Oils." I mostly missed the right-wing hysteria over seed oils, but Aubrey and Michael do a good job explaining it for normies who have real problems.

It's also a notable episode because it has a great quote from Andrew Tate of all people: "I can tell you losers have never had real enemies. You're afraid of sunflowers." I wish this wasn't an Andrew Tate quote because "I can tell you've never had a real enemy" is a phrase I would like to incorporate into my regular vocabulary.

There's something vaguely occult horror about one of the big driving engines of politics being people who are afraid to die, and think that if they just eat the right thing, death will never come for them. All the time setting up a situation in which people can't be vaccinated against deadly and preventable diseases. All these people obsessing over sunflowers while their kids are dying of measles, they repeatedly infect themselves with covid, and they've given up on FDA measures to control the amount of sawdust in their bread.
Page generated 30 Aug 2025 01:34
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios